Developing a Collaborative Agenda for Humanities and Social Scientific Research on Laboratory Animal Science and Welfare

نویسندگان

  • Gail F. Davies
  • Beth J Greenhough
  • Pru Hobson-West
  • Robert G. W. Kirk
  • Ken Applebee
  • Laura C. Bellingan
  • Manuel Berdoy
  • Henry Buller
  • Helen J. Cassaday
  • Keith Davies
  • Daniela Diefenbacher
  • Tone Druglitrø
  • Maria Paula Escobar
  • Carrie Friese
  • Kathrin Herrmann
  • Amy Hinterberger
  • Wendy J. Jarrett
  • Kimberley Jayne
  • Adam M. Johnson
  • Elizabeth R. Johnson
  • Timm Konold
  • Matthew C. Leach
  • Sabina Leonelli
  • David I. Lewis
  • Elliot J. Lilley
  • Emma R. Longridge
  • Carmen M. McLeod
  • Mara Miele
  • Nicole C. Nelson
  • Elisabeth H. Ormandy
  • Helen Pallett
  • Lonneke Poort
  • Pandora Pound
  • Edmund Ramsden
  • Emma Roe
  • Helen Scalway
  • Astrid Schrader
  • Chris J. Scotton
  • Cheryl L. Scudamore
  • Jane A. Smith
  • Lucy Whitfield
  • Sarah Wolfensohn
چکیده

Improving laboratory animal science and welfare requires both new scientific research and insights from research in the humanities and social sciences. Whilst scientific research provides evidence to replace, reduce and refine procedures involving laboratory animals (the '3Rs'), work in the humanities and social sciences can help understand the social, economic and cultural processes that enhance or impede humane ways of knowing and working with laboratory animals. However, communication across these disciplinary perspectives is currently limited, and they design research programmes, generate results, engage users, and seek to influence policy in different ways. To facilitate dialogue and future research at this interface, we convened an interdisciplinary group of 45 life scientists, social scientists, humanities scholars, non-governmental organisations and policy-makers to generate a collaborative research agenda. This drew on methods employed by other agenda-setting exercises in science policy, using a collaborative and deliberative approach for the identification of research priorities. Participants were recruited from across the community, invited to submit research questions and vote on their priorities. They then met at an interactive workshop in the UK, discussed all 136 questions submitted, and collectively defined the 30 most important issues for the group. The output is a collaborative future agenda for research in the humanities and social sciences on laboratory animal science and welfare. The questions indicate a demand for new research in the humanities and social sciences to inform emerging discussions and priorities on the governance and practice of laboratory animal research, including on issues around: international harmonisation, openness and public engagement, 'cultures of care', harm-benefit analysis and the future of the 3Rs. The process outlined below underlines the value of interdisciplinary exchange for improving communication across different research cultures and identifies ways of enhancing the effectiveness of future research at the interface between the humanities, social sciences, science and science policy.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

I-17: Recent Developments in Animal Welfare Sciencee

The methodology for the scientific assessment of animal welfare has developed rapidly in recent years and has become a major scientific discipline. The concepts of welfare, need, stress, health, pain, emotion and feeling are now clarified. In teaching, legislation and practical work referring to animal welfare, a clear definition that can be related to other concepts is needed. The welfare of a...

متن کامل

Chinese Co-Authored Papers in the Humanities and Social Sciences Indexed by SSCI and A&HCL, 1995-2004: A Statistical Analysis

Collaborative research is one of the most noteworthy trends in the development of scientific research, and co-authored papers are some of the most important results of this research. With the speed-up of globalization, wider adoption of computers and advanced communication technologies, and more frequent academic exchanges and co-operation, collaborative research across organizations, regions, ...

متن کامل

Humanistic Environmental Studies and Global Indigeneities

The Environmental Humanities constitute an emerging transdisciplinary enterprise that is becoming a key part of the liberal arts and an indispensable component of the twenty-first-century university. Bringing together scholars from a number of environmentally related fields in the humanities and allied social sciences—including Ecocriticism (Literature and Environment studies), Environmental Hi...

متن کامل

ضرورتهای نظارت اخلاقی بر وضعیت کار با حیوانات آزمایشگاهی در کشور

Background and Objective: In order to ethically supervise laboratory animal (LA) researches, various regulatory structures (RS) are developed in many countries. Our primary hypothesis was that these RS are not well developed in Iran, therefore, we aimed to propose the principles of developing these RS in our country, based on scientific principles and religious morals. Materials and Meth...

متن کامل

I-16: The Evolution of Morality and Implications for Animal Usage

The propensity to show moral behaviour has evolved in all animals living in complex societies as it promotes social stability. All major religions provide a structure for a moral code. The code is valuable in the societies where the religions have influence. The most important aspects of morality are the same in all countries. Because of their moral code, people consider that they have obligati...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 11  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016